
Keywords: governance of environmental biotechnologies
![]() |
Gene Editing in the Wild: Shaping Decisions through Broad Public DeliberationM. K. Gusmano, G. E. Kaebnick, K. J. Maschke, C. P. Neuhaus and B. C. Wills, The Hastings Center Report, 51. 2021.![]() The essays in this special report grew out of a project funded by the National Science Foundation (with NSF award number 1827935). Gregory E. Kaebnick and Michael K. Gusmano were co-principal investigators on the project, and Karen J. Maschke and Carolyn P. Neuhaus were ... Keywords: bioethics, democratic deliberation, environmental governance, gene drive synthetic, gene editing, genetic bioontrol, governance of environmental biotechnologies, stakeholder engagement |
![]() |
The Decision Phases Framework for Public Engagement: Engaging Stakeholders about Gene Editing in the WildS. K. Barnhill-Dilling, A. Kokotovich and J. A. Delborne, Hastings Center Report, 51 Suppl 2:S48-s61. 2021.![]() Some experts and advocates propose environmental biotechnologies such as genetic engineering, gene drive systems, and synthetic biology as potential solutions to accelerating rates of species loss. While these tools may offer hope for a seemingly intractable problem, they also ... Keywords: bioethics, democratic deliberation, environmental governance, gene drive synthetic, gene editing, genetic bioontrol, governance of environmental biotechnologies, stakeholder engagement |

Contact
David O’Brochta
Foundation for the
National Institutes of Health
geneconvenevi@fnih.org
RSS