Synthetic gene drive: between continuity and novelty: Crucial differences between gene drive and genetically modified organisms require an adapted risk assessment for their use
Simon, SO, Mathias; Engelhard, Margret,
EMBO Reports,
19:e45760.
2018.
Gene drive organisms differ from “classical” genetically modified organisms in several crucial aspects. It would require new approaches for risk assessment to gauge their potential impact on the environment. While some argue that current risk assessment frameworks can accommodate synthetic gene drives, others call for a moratorium owing to gene drives’ potentially detrimental impact on wildlife
https://www.geneconvenevi.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/EMBO-Reports-3.png300300Academic Web Pages/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/GC-color-logo-for-header-3277-x-827-1030x260.pngAcademic Web Pages2018-01-12 00:00:002020-04-22 16:36:02Synthetic gene drive: between continuity and novelty: Crucial differences between gene drive and genetically modified organisms require an adapted risk assessment for their use